Today we’ll all be hearing a lot more about the plans for HS2, the Government’s flagship construction project and all-round Keynesian boot in the pants for the UK economy. Most of what will pass for debate will involve some light class warfare about the route through Tory constituencies, seasoned with a dash of NIMBYism, some chest beating from Labour who started the whole thing but can’t be seen to support it fully and various other bits of pointless to-ing and fro-ing. But what is most remarkable about the scheme as far as Insight is concerned, is how its business case completely and deliberately ignores the way we work.
So if the new railway is symbolic of anything it is of the clash between the old ways of working and the new. Not only could a fraction of this money be spent on transforming the country’s technological infrastructure, albeit in an invisible and therefore less politically malleable form, the business case for HS2 is built on two remarkable assumptions; firstly that the average person using a train earns £70,000 a year but most incredibly the idea that nobody does any work while travelling.
Only once you make this latter assumption can you get to the cynical heart of what has happened with the argument for this train. Then you simply state that ‘time is money’ like a Victorian mill owner pulling a watch on a chain from his waistcoat pocket and bish-bosh – you have your argument that a £32 billion investment can yield you £47 billion in economic benefits based on 35 minute savings of supposedly wasted time on trains.
This is all compete rubbish of course as opponents of the scheme such as the Institute of Economic Affairs think tank have pointed out in great detail. I’m on a train from the North West of England to London this afternoon and I can predict with some certainty that the two hours I spend on it are likely to be the most productive of my day.
The same will be the case for the dozens of other laptop toting rail warriors alongside me. We all know that, unless we’ve booked a seat during half-term, the train can provide exactly the sort of focussed work environment conducive to getting some proper work done. In fact the whole country might be a lot more productive and happy if we actually slowed the trains down and spent the money on something else as Rory Sutherland points out in his characteristically eloquent and amusing way in the TED Talk above.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
January 28, 2013
A train that symbolises the clash of old and new ways of work
by Mark Eltringham • Comment, Technology, Workplace, Workplace design
Today we’ll all be hearing a lot more about the plans for HS2, the Government’s flagship construction project and all-round Keynesian boot in the pants for the UK economy. Most of what will pass for debate will involve some light class warfare about the route through Tory constituencies, seasoned with a dash of NIMBYism, some chest beating from Labour who started the whole thing but can’t be seen to support it fully and various other bits of pointless to-ing and fro-ing. But what is most remarkable about the scheme as far as Insight is concerned, is how its business case completely and deliberately ignores the way we work.
So if the new railway is symbolic of anything it is of the clash between the old ways of working and the new. Not only could a fraction of this money be spent on transforming the country’s technological infrastructure, albeit in an invisible and therefore less politically malleable form, the business case for HS2 is built on two remarkable assumptions; firstly that the average person using a train earns £70,000 a year but most incredibly the idea that nobody does any work while travelling.
Only once you make this latter assumption can you get to the cynical heart of what has happened with the argument for this train. Then you simply state that ‘time is money’ like a Victorian mill owner pulling a watch on a chain from his waistcoat pocket and bish-bosh – you have your argument that a £32 billion investment can yield you £47 billion in economic benefits based on 35 minute savings of supposedly wasted time on trains.
This is all compete rubbish of course as opponents of the scheme such as the Institute of Economic Affairs think tank have pointed out in great detail. I’m on a train from the North West of England to London this afternoon and I can predict with some certainty that the two hours I spend on it are likely to be the most productive of my day.
The same will be the case for the dozens of other laptop toting rail warriors alongside me. We all know that, unless we’ve booked a seat during half-term, the train can provide exactly the sort of focussed work environment conducive to getting some proper work done. In fact the whole country might be a lot more productive and happy if we actually slowed the trains down and spent the money on something else as Rory Sutherland points out in his characteristically eloquent and amusing way in the TED Talk above.