April 19, 2023
Hybrid working can facilitate major carbon savings and has the potential for significant impact on the climate crisis, according to a new study by IWG and Arup. The study measured the environmental impact of hybrid working on six cities across the US and UK with a deep dive on two major carbon contributors – London and LA. Others examined were New York City, Atlanta, Manchester and Glasgow. All six cities showed the potential for huge carbon savings through the widespread adoption of hybrid working, which has rapidly expanded amongst white collar workers, who are now using the available technology to work where is most convenient and they are most productive.
Cities in the U.S. showed the largest potential carbon savings, due to the prevalence of commuting by car, with Atlanta (90 percent reduction) just edging out Los Angeles (87 percent) and New York (82 percent).
The potential carbon savings remain significant for UK cities with Glasgow (80 percent), Manchester (70 percent) and London (49 percent) all showing potential to benefit from workers reducing their commutes and working closer to home as part of a hybrid model.
IWG’s study with Arup compared different working scenarios for white-collar workers including:
- Exclusively from city centre workspaces
- From city centre workspaces and local workspaces
- From city centre workspaces and home
- A combination of all three
The team looked at the total emissions per worker based on transport, heating, cooling, lighting, energy use and more, to understand the climate impact.
The impact of the commute
A traditional five-day commute into a city centre has the biggest carbon footprint of all. In the UK in 2020, 25 percent of carbon emissions came from the transport sector, the most of any sector. In London specifically, roughly one in three people drive to work. Nationwide, this figure rises to approximately two in three. Per capita transport emissions in the U.S. are 2.5 times higher than the UK due to the adoption of larger, less fuel-efficient vehicles and low public transport ridership in all but a handful of cities.
The study found that in London, carbon emissions were reduced by 49 percent for those mixing time between a city centre HQ and local workspace, and 43 percent lower when splitting time between a local workspace and home, when compared to a traditional 5-day commuting pattern. They key driver in emissions reductions was distance; when workers more frequently stay near home, their emissions are lessened.
Compared with offices in the city centre, local workspaces were found to have less emissions per square meter of floor area. Crucially, local workspaces have higher utilisation rates, and therefore, each person is responsible for less emissions than a central office location.
Employees benefit from hybrid working
Hybrid working is proving to be especially attractive for employees, with 88 per cent of workers saying flexible working was important in a new role to save money and achieve a better work/life balance. By living and working closer to home, hybrid working helps people be healthier and more productive. In a similar survey of HR professionals in the US, IWG found that the overwhelming majority (94 percent) use hybrid working to recruit new talent, with 93 percent saying it is a key tool for them. Not only does hybrid working provide health benefits, analysis by IWG also highlights the extent of the savings that working locally can offer hybrid workers.
Employees who have optimised their working habits like this are leading more localised lives, living and working closer to home, making them healthier and more productive. Analysis by IWG highlights the extent of the savings that working locally can offer hybrid workers. Someone based in Cambridge – which has seen a huge increase in local working over the past year – could save up to £2,931 a year by working from Cambridge-based workspace instead of a London HQ just one day a week, with this figure increasing to £8,793 by working locally three days a week.