Apprenticeship levy has failed to increase investment in workplace training

The Government made an empty promise when it said the apprenticeship levy would boost the amount of money employers spend on workplace training, claims a new report from the CIPD. Addressing employer under-investment in training, the case for a broader training levy reveals that 31 percent of levy paying employers say the levy will lead them to increase the amount they spend on training. This is down from 45 percent in July 2017 when it was introduced.

The report, based on survey data from 2,000 employers, also claims that 58 percent of levy paying employers either believe the levy will either have no impact on the amount of money they spend on training, or will actually lead to a reduction in training spend.

The key objectives of the levy were to increase apprenticeship numbers and boost investment in workplace training, which was in a 20-year decline when it was introduced in April 2017. However, the report claims that the levy has failed on both these counts. As well as not boosting skills investment in most workplaces, the levy has meant employers have invested in fewer apprenticeships with starts falling from 509,400 in 2015/16 to 375,800 in 2017/18.


Key findings

• 22 percent of the 2,000 employers surveyed said they use their levy money on training which would’ve happened regardless.

• 15 percent say they use the scheme to accredit skills which staff already have.

• 14 percent of employers report the apprenticeship levy has had the effect of directing funds away from other forms of training that are more appropriate for their organisation.

In light of the report, the CIPD is calling for the apprenticeship levy to be replaced with a broader training levy. This would enable organisations to fund both apprenticeships and other forms of accredited training which are better suited to their needs.

[perfectpullquote align=”right” bordertop=”false” cite=”” link=”” color=”” class=”” size=””]”The apprenticeship levy has failed to deliver what the Government said it would.”[/perfectpullquote]

The CIPD also wants the levy to cover all employers with a headcount of 50 or more to double the amount raised by the levy to £5 billion, which would help to make up the shortfall from the decline in investment over the last two decades. A portion of the training levy fund could also be used to create a regional skills fund to address skills challenges at a local level, such as helping smaller non-levy paying firms to invest in skills by providing better business support.

Lizzie Crowley, skills adviser at the CIPD, said “Our research clearly shows the apprenticeship levy has failed to deliver what the Government said it would: more investment in workplace training. For this to become a reality, we need to have a broader training levy that is much less prescriptive and gives employers more flexibility. This should also help to prevent employers from gaming the system as is currently the case.”

“With only 2 percent of employers required to pay the apprenticeship levy, the money raised from it was never going to be enough to close the gap that’s been left by the long-term decline in training investment. But if we had more employers contributing, we could make up the shortfall and also help to boost regional investment in skills.”