The British Council for Offices claims that it is ‘Britain’s leading forum for the discussion and debate of issues affecting the office sector. Its members are organisations involved in creating, acquiring or occupying office space, whether architects, lawyers, surveyors, financial institutions or public agencies.’ If true, this makes its Specification Guide all the more remarkable for not only being wide of the mark about at least one key issue when it was published back in 2009, but about which it is growing increasingly redundant by the day.
My particular hang-up has long been the hoo-ha with which the BCO launched its updated guide in 2009 with what it seemed to think was the groundbreaking idea that office space standards had fallen to 11.8 square metres per person in the four years since the previous edition in 2005.
Even three or four years ago, this was still a high number according to all I was told about how space was used, the BCO hasn’t updated the guide since and it’s still for sale on the BCO website so is presumably still informing the way in which buildings are developed. This is not a good thing because before we even begin to fit out these buildings and work in them, they may already belong to a past both structurally and culturally.
You could also argue that there is a problem with the very idea of ‘space standards’ in the first place given that so much space within offices is now not merely shared but socialised. Creating buildings using linear equations about the number of people that work in them is increasingly irrelevant when work and workplaces are so complex that some other form of maths would be a better way of calculating their size and shape.
I don’t doubt the Specification Guide has plenty of other useful advice and information, but on the subject of space standards it is misguided and misguiding on several levels.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
February 28, 2013
Workplace Anachronisms: No. 1 – the BCO Specification Guide
by Mark Eltringham • Comment, Facilities management, Property, Workplace design
The British Council for Offices claims that it is ‘Britain’s leading forum for the discussion and debate of issues affecting the office sector. Its members are organisations involved in creating, acquiring or occupying office space, whether architects, lawyers, surveyors, financial institutions or public agencies.’ If true, this makes its Specification Guide all the more remarkable for not only being wide of the mark about at least one key issue when it was published back in 2009, but about which it is growing increasingly redundant by the day.
My particular hang-up has long been the hoo-ha with which the BCO launched its updated guide in 2009 with what it seemed to think was the groundbreaking idea that office space standards had fallen to 11.8 square metres per person in the four years since the previous edition in 2005.
Even three or four years ago, this was still a high number according to all I was told about how space was used, the BCO hasn’t updated the guide since and it’s still for sale on the BCO website so is presumably still informing the way in which buildings are developed. This is not a good thing because before we even begin to fit out these buildings and work in them, they may already belong to a past both structurally and culturally.
You could also argue that there is a problem with the very idea of ‘space standards’ in the first place given that so much space within offices is now not merely shared but socialised. Creating buildings using linear equations about the number of people that work in them is increasingly irrelevant when work and workplaces are so complex that some other form of maths would be a better way of calculating their size and shape.
I don’t doubt the Specification Guide has plenty of other useful advice and information, but on the subject of space standards it is misguided and misguiding on several levels.