May 14, 2013
How ingrained assumptions about the workplace are eroding
The first day at a new job used to mean getting the answer to that all important question: “so which is my office?” In today’s mostly open plan environments, the same psychological attachment has been transferred to the desk – ‘my’ desk. However the current trend for flexible approaches to where people work means that even the concept of having one’s own desk is now under attack. So how much does having your own desk matter to the UK office workforce these days? We have been asking employees how they feel about having their own desk. The results seem to be that more than half, on average 56% (of a total of 2,653 employees surveyed at 5 recent client projects), think that it is ‘very important’ and a further 25% think it is ‘quite important’.
Yet we, like others are seemingly flying in the face of what the majority of employees currently think and are designing much more flexible workspaces, where people do not necessarily have their own desk and instead have a range and diversity of different spaces within the building at their disposal, depending on the task at hand. In fact, when we ask those same employees whether they would be likely to use a range of facilities to work from if they were available, 58% say yes they would be very or quite likely to. People seem to want have their cake and eat it.
And when organisations are interested in fostering greater collaboration, then a flexible rather than a static approach to workplace design can be part of the answer. What of course this means is that people are no longer sitting at their own desks for so much of the day, if indeed they have a desk at all; they are, amongst other things, spending a lot more time moving about. Our research shows this effect very clearly: on average pre-design intervention we have found only 1 in 17 people are walking about in the office space at any given time, whereas in the post occupancy studies we’ve conducted, that average increases to 1 in 10. A static environment becomes more dynamic, people are more likely to encounter their colleagues and in an unplanned way.
So what does this say for the future of your own desk? Well change takes time. Many people will insist they still need their desk. And they may still get it, maybe a smaller one, in a more intelligent layout, where people in teams that are already working flexibly may share desks and use alternative workpoints at a long bench or in quieter areas that actually suit their job better than the traditional open plan ‘desk’. Plus they get communal spaces where people can meet and talk to each other more easily. Sometimes a re-design is an opportunity for people to realise how little they actually use their desk and to softly change ingrained assumptions. It may in fact work out better for them as well as for the business.
________________________________________________
Ros Pomeroy is head of research at Spacelab. She has more than 20 years’ experience working with businesses to manage change effectively as well as a Masters in Advanced Architectural Studies from Bartlett School, UCL. Originally an engineer, she ran her own change management and communications consultancy and worked as Head of Organisation and Change Management at T-Mobile International. https://www.spacelab.co.uk
Roger Carr
May 14, 2013 @ 5:37 pm
The need for a ‘home base’ would seem to be a fairly basic human requirement, whether it is a desk, a locker, or a bag. But it does seem that with cost implications and the increasing need to be lean and competitive, something often has to give.
It was not so long ago that workers had to be encouraged to use collaborative areas, as to be seen away from one’s desk was associated with ‘skiving off’ work. I find it interesting that one of the high points in office furniture design, when a lot of the current ideas on flexible working came into being, was in the 90’s, before the second wave of mobile technology (smart phones etc.) hit. At the time the furniture manufacturers seemed ahead of the game, with new products anticipating flexible working and the need to create various functional settings with an office. Brayton with the Migrations chair, the instigator of all the mobile collaborative work seats, Metro with Bix which created the high back screened soft seating layouts and indeed Kyo with it’s user accessible power in meeting tables, mobile screens to create adhoc discussion and meeting ‘cabins’ to try to solve the problem of noise in a more open office environment.
Bench desking at the end of that decade enabled the clean refectory style of working that many architects desired whilst also providing a possibility for slightly denser occupancy and a reduced hardware cost, helped to set a pattern for lower overheads, but also a product cul de sac, that has proved difficult to surpass.
The need for one’s ‘own desk’ I am sure could be translated into a ‘home’ or a ‘base’, which indeed today does not have to be a workstation, or desk per se, but could be the heart of a new generation of system created around the more nomadic, yet still connected worker, who is no longer tethered to a desk based screen.
The interesting fact is that whilst manufacturers of systems were selling workstations back in the nineties, budgets for developing new generations of system for a ‘just ahead’ future were available, now the technologies and the social acceptance of those ideas are here, economic changes have resulted in the restriction of such new developments.
So it would seem that a lot of people are looking towards that next step – the ‘next big thing’ is quite possibly overdue in the furniture world. Mark Eltringham lamented on the lack of a new generation of Iconic designs here recently. it could be that the change in worker expectations and the power of their mobile devices have made furniture less relevant, but it would be interesting to take up the challenge of both the needs of the collaborative and the private worker in today’s office.
Mark Eltringham
May 15, 2013 @ 6:41 am
Roger. You should blog on the subject for us.
Roger Carr
May 15, 2013 @ 9:52 am
Thank you Mark – That’s very kind. I do need a few more hours in the day though. Something no workplace thinking has been able to get close to accommodating yet as far as I know!
Mark Eltringham
May 15, 2013 @ 10:17 am
Maybe so but you could have done that response as a blog and had some nice publicity from it too. m 🙂